Inside the Core Engine
Want to back the stream? The «داعم» membership on YouTube is EGP 60 a month: badges, emoji, and I answer your questions first on stream. Become a supporter
The gist
The stream centers on developing the Burnish Shopify app, especially refining its multi-step onboarding so it feels native and consistent with Shopify, communicates merchant value clearly, and improves copy, cards, navigation, and pricing using visual references. The work remained unfinished: content and design revisions, backend wiring, deep-link behavior, and onboarding’s dependency on database state still required attention. In parallel, Luqman explores a safer Git workflow for multiple coding agents—cleaning the repository, isolating tasks with branches and worktrees, detecting conflicts before merge, validating development servers and URLs, and maintaining a living diagnostic log of difficult problems and fixes. Audience questions and broader discussions cover SEO and GEO, AI-driven product discovery, using funnel signals to assess demand, and practical advice for learning while building a SaaS product. The stream also contains personal, qualified impressions of Codex, Claude, Gemini, GPT, and coding benchmarks, stressing that outcomes depend partly on how tools are used and that informal comparisons do not support firm conclusions.
109 moments from the stream
- 5:50:17
An inconclusive hands-on comparison of AI models
The speaker attempted to compare models presented as Gemini and GPT using an interactive game task. Both attempts showed control or display problems, so the comparison did not support a reliable verdict; the speaker criticized the test itself and wondered whether he was using it incorrectly.
- 6:00:55
Comparing AI Models Through a Chess Game
A side experiment compared AI models through generated chess interfaces, including playing a game and inspecting its behavior. Gemini’s game logic was considered capable despite losing the match, while another prototype showed incorrect piece colors and inconsistent square sizing, and its interface was judged substantially weaker. The informal comparison ultimately favored Gemini.
- 6:02:30
Simplifying Step Cards in an Onboarding Flow
The design feedback called for removing the extra box at the bottom of later-step cards, keeping only the essential information, and making each card compact and tidy. The discussion also indicated a four-step flow with a pricing-related final step, though implementation details were limited.
- 6:14:40
Redesigning the Brand-Understanding Confirmation Step
A full refactor of onboarding step three was proposed using a competitor reference, with the confirm-and-continue action kept above the fold. Core inputs include the business name, description, and primary target market, while topic pillars could be generated automatically and remain user-editable. The suggested sequence was to reproduce the interface first and connect the backend afterward, balancing data accuracy with close visual alignment.
- 6:20:56
Simplifying the Business Details Confirmation Screen
A proposed interface revision removes the topic pillars while retaining the business name, description, and primary target market, placing the confirm-and-continue button beneath them and keeping the box that explains what the user will receive.
- 6:26:33
Integrating a 3D Logo and Reviewing Its Visual Identity
An attempt to locate and download a GLB logo file for use on the website, followed by a review of its 360-degree appearance, 3D effect, and border details. The discussion asks for specific design feedback and preserves one participant's opinion that some alternatives evoke cryptocurrency or blockchain branding.
- 6:31:25
Logo Concept and Brand Color Palette
The speaker explains that the logo uses geometric forms and a polished circular effect intended to reflect the brand name, while acknowledging that the mark may initially read as the number three rather than a letter. He treats the current design as provisional and open to change as the application develops, but keeps the website color palette fixed for now and postpones revisiting the logo and broader identity.
- 6:34:13
Maintaining Consistency Across Interface Steps
While reviewing the third step, the speaker notices differences in corner rounding and in the number of displayed points compared with earlier steps, and calls for those visual details to remain consistent.
- 6:38:37
Reusing Plans and Pricing UI and Wiring the Flow
The speaker plans to complete the plans-and-pricing step by reusing an already refined version from the application settings, then wiring the buttons and finishing the setup flow. He also expects to continue the application design later, while noting concern about a step related to the merchandise itself.
Got a question about something in this stream?
Ask in the group